Susceptibility response of varieties and local populations of lupines to Bruchus rufimanus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Ivelina Mitkova NIKOLOVA

Abstract


This study aimed to evaluate the susceptibility response of varieties and local populations of lupines to Bruchus rufimanus in multi-environment field tests. Seed damaged rate and susceptibility index were assessed in each environment and subjected to a heritability-adjusted genotype and genotype x environment biplot analysis. It was found that the susceptibility index of damaged seeds was positively related to precipitation amounts and humidity, and inversely to min and max temperatures. The seed damaged rate was positively related to temperatures but negatively to rain and humidity. The local polish population WAT and cultivars Pink Mutant, Solnechnii, and Bezimenii 1 had the lowest seed damaged rate and stable position across environments. Meanwhile, these cultivars showed a low susceptibility index and low variability. The discrepancy between the early phenological development of ‘Pink Mutant’, ‘Solnechnii’, and ‘Bezimenii 1’ and the life cycle of B. rufimanus was one of the reasons for manifested tolerance. Correlations between damaged seed and susceptibility index as well as the mass of 1000 seeds and sensitivity index were strongly positive and negative, respectively. ‘WAT’, ‘Pink Mutant’, ‘Solnechnii’, and ‘Bezimenii 1’ had a clear advantage in defending itself from B. rufimanus attack, which makes them particularly interesting for breeding purposes.

Keywords


Bruchus rufimanus; Lupinus albus; HA-GGE biplot analysis; seed damaged rate; susceptibility index

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, M.J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

Bell, S., & Crane, E. (2016). Farming oilseed rape without neonicotinoids. Research Report Commissioned by Friends of the Earth. Retrieved from https://cdn.friendsoftheearth.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/Farming%20Oilseed%20Rape%20without%20Neonicotinoids.pdf

Bruce, T.J., Martin, J.L., Smart, L.E., & Pickett, J.A. (2011). Development of semiochemical attractants for monitoring bean seed beetle, Bruchus rufimanus. Pest Management Science, 67, 1303–1308. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2186

Ceballos, R., Fernbndez, N., Zyсiga, S., & Zapata, N. (2015). Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of pea weevil Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) to volatiles collected from its host Pisum sativum L. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 75, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392015000200009

Delobel, B., & Delobel, A. (2006). Dietary specialisation in European species groups of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Bruchinae). Oecologia, 149, 428-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0461-9

Ebedah, I.M.A., Mahmoud, Y.A., & Moawad, S.S. (2006). Susceptibility of some faba bean cultivars to field infestations with some insect pests. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2, 537-540.

Elden, T.C. (2000). Effects of proteinase inhibitors and plant lectins on the adult alfalfa beetle (Coleoptera: Curculinoidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 35, 62−69. https://doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-35.1.62

Gabriel, K.R. (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58, 453–467. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334381

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., & Ryanh, P.D. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf

Harris, B.M. (1980). Insects associated with the lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) cultivars fest and uniharvest. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury, Lincoln College, New Zealand, pp. 248.

Hasan, F., & Ansari, S. (2016). Temperature-dependent development and demography of Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Parthenium hysterophorus. Annals of Applied Biology, 168, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12244

Hurej, M., Twardowski, J.P., & Kozak, M. (2013). Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) assemblages in the fields of narrow-leafed lupin sown as pure stand and intercropped with spring triticale. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 100(4), 393‒400. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2013.100.050

Keneni, G., Bekele, E., Getu, E., Imtiaz, M., Damte, T., Mulatu, B., & Dagne, K. (2011). Breeding Food Legumes for Resistance to Storage Insect Pests: Potential and Limitations. Sustainability, 3(9), 1399-1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3091399

Kutcherov, D. (2015). Temperature dependent development in Chrysomela vigintipunctata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a stenothermal early-season breeder. Journal of Thermal Biology, 53, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2015.08.001

Kuzmova, K. (2002). World agro-climatic analogues of Bulgaria on the conditions of cultivation of peas. Jubilee session „120 years of agricultural science in Sadovo“, 113-118.

Makarem, H.A.E., Kholy, S.E.E., Abdel-Latif, A., & Seif, A.I. (2017). Effect of some botanical oils on the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Egyptian Journal of Experimental Biology (Zoology), 13(2), 273 – 282. https://doi.org/10.5455/egysebz.20171025013938

Mansoor, M.M., Afzal, M., Raza, A.B.M., Akram, Z., Waqar, A., & Afzal, M.B.S. (2015). Post-exposure temperature influence on the toxicity of conventional and new chemistry insecticides to green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 22, 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.10.008

Mateus, C., Mexia, A., Duarte, I., Pereira, G., & Tavares de Sousa, M. (2011). Evaluation of damage caused by bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on peas (Pisum sativum L.). Acta Horticulturae, 917, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.917.15

Ramos, R.Y., & Fernández-Carrillo, E. (2011). Life cycle and behaviour of the lupine seed beetle, Bruchidius rubiginosus (Desbrochers, 1869) in the Iberian Peninsula (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 31 (12), 253‒259. Retrieved from: http://sea-entomologia.org/Publicaciones/PDF/BOLN_49/253259BSEA49Bruchidiusrubiginosusciclo.pdf

Roubinet, E. (2016). Management of the broad bean weevil (Bruchus rufimanus Boh.) in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). Technical report. Retrieved from https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/13631/1/roubinet_e_160704.pdf

Rubiales, D., Flores, F., Emeran, A.A., Kharrat, M., Amri, M., Rojas-Molina, M.M., & Sillero, J.C. (2014). Identification and multi-environment validation of resistance against broomrapes (Orobanche crenata and Orobanche foetida) in faba bean (Vicia faba). Field Crops Research, 166, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.010

Sánchez-Martín, J., Rubiales, D., Flores, F., Emeran, A.A., Shtaya, M.J.Y., Sillero, J.C., Allagui, M.B., & Prats, E. (2014). Adaptation of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars to autumn sowings in Mediterranean environments. Field Crops Research, 156, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.018

Scarafoni, A., Consonni, A., Galbusera, V., Negri, A., Tedeschi, G., Rasmussen, P., Magni, C., & Duranti, M. (2008). Identificaion and characterization of a Bowman-Birk inhibitor active towards trypsin but not chymotrypsin in Lupinus albus seeds. Phytochemistry, 69, 1820−1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.03.023

Sharma, P., Nath, A.K., Kumari, R., & Bhardwaj, S.V. (2012). Purification, characterization and evaluation of insecticidal activity of trypsin inhibitor from Albizia lebbeck seeds. Journal of Forestry Research, 23(1), 131−137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0243-7

Shazali, M.E.H. (1989). The susceptibility of faba bean and other seed legumes to infestation by Bruchidius incarnatus (BOH,) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F,) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). AGRIS since: 1989. Retrieved from http://agris,fao,org/agris-search/search,do?recordID=QV8900071

Southgate, B.J. (1979). Biology of the Bruchidae. Annual Review of Entomology. 24. 449-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.24.010179.002313

Stewart AJA, Bantock TM, Beckmann BC, Botham MS, Hubble D, & Roy DB. (2015). The role of ecological interactions in determining species ranges and range changes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115, 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12543

Ströcker, K., Wendt, S., Kirchner, W.H., & Struck, Ch. (2013). Feeding preference of the weevils Sitona gressorius and Sitona griseus on different lupin genotypes and the role of alkaloids. Arthropod–Plant Interact, 7, 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-013-9273-0

Szafirowska, A. (2012). The role of cultivars and sowing date in control of broad bean weevil (Bruchus rufimanus Boh.) in organic cultivation. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 77, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-012-0013-2

Ward, R.L. (2018). The biology and ecology of Bruchus rufimanus (bean seed beetle). Ph.D. tesses, Newcastle University England.

Yan, W., & Holland, J.B. (2010). A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica, 171, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0030-5

Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40, 597–605. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x

Yan, W. (2001). GGEbiplot—a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x

Yan, W., & Rajcan, I. (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42, 1, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0011

Zhou, Z., Guo, J., Chen, H., & Wan, F. (2010). Effects of temperature on survival, development, longevity, and fecundity of Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a potential biological control agent against Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asterales: Asteraceae). Environmental Entomology, 39, 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09176




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14720/aas.2021.117.2.1855

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ivelina Mitkova Nikolova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

Acta agriculturae Slovenica is an Open Access journal published under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY License.

                           


eISSN 1854-1941