Differences between sheep and red deer in in vitro apparent and true digestibility of commonly used red deer feeds
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barbosa, P., & Bowyer, R. T. (2000). Sexual segregation in dimorphic deer: a new gastrocentric hypothesis. Journal of Mammalogy, 81, 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081%3C0473:SSIDDA%3E2.0.CO;2
Crawford, H. S., & Hankinson, D. H. (1984). White-tailed deer vs. bovine inocula for in vitro digestibilities. Journal of Wildlife Management, 48, 649–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801211
DLG. (1997). DLG Futterwerttabellen: Wiederkäuer (7th revised and extended edition). Frankfurt: DLG-Verlag.
Gordon, I. J., Pérez-Barbería, F. J., & Cuartas, P. (2002). The influence of adaptation of rumen microflora on in vitro digestion of different forages by sheep and red deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 1930–1937. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-179
Goering, H. K., & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agriculture handbook 379. Washington, DC, USA: ARS USDA.
Hervás, G., Ranilla, M. J., Mantecón, A. R., Bodas, R., & Frutos, P. (2004). Comparison of in vitro digestibility of feedstuffs using rumen inoculum from sheep or red deer. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 13(Suppl. 1), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/73746/2004
Henderson, G., Cox, F., Ganesh, S., Jonker, A., & Young, W., Global Rumen Census Collaborators, Janssen, P. H. (2015). Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Scientific Reports, 5, 14567. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567
Jerina, K. (2007). The effects of habitat structure on red deer (Cervus elaphus) body mass. Zbornik Gozdarstva in Lesarstva, 82, 3–13.
Menke, K. H., & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28, 375–386.
Neumann, K., & Bassler, R. (1976). Methodenbuch, Band III. Neudamm: Verlag J. Neumann.
Palmer, W. L., Cowan, R. L., & Amman, A. P. (1976) Effect of inoculum source on in vitro digestion of deer foods. Journal of Wildlife Management, 40, 301–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/3800429
Rajský, M., Vodňanský, M., Hell, P., Slamečka, J., Kropil, R., & Rajský, D. (2008). Influence of supplementary feeding on bark browsing by red deer (Cervus elaphus) under experimental conditions. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54, 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0199-2
Ru, Y. J., Glatz, P. C., Miao, Z. H., Swanson, K., Falkenberg, S., & Wyatt, S. (2002). Comparison of the digestibility of grain and forage by sheep, red deer and fallow deer. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, 15, 800–805. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.800
SAS Institute Inc. (2015). SAS/STAT user’s guide: Statistics (release 9.4). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Schwartz, C. C., & Nagy, J. G. (1972). Maintaining deer rumen fluid for in vitro digestion studies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 36, 1341–1343. https://doi.org/10.2307/3799281
Tilley, J. M. A, & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 18, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14720/aas.2018.112.1.1
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Andrej LAVRENČIČ, Darko VETERNIK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Acta agriculturae Slovenica is an Open Access journal published under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY License.
eISSN 1854-1941