Ovrednotenje relativne občutljivosti šestih sort hrušk na malo hruševo bolšico (Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster, 1848))

Mohammad Saeed EMAMI

Povzetek


Mala hruševa bolšica, Cacopsylla pyricola (Förster, 1848) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), je eden izmed najbolj uničujočih škodljivcev v komercialnih nasadih hrušk. Sorte z majnim deležem okužbe z bolšico bi lahko uporabili pri integriranem upravljanju s hruševo bolšico. Naravna okužba s hruševo bolšico je bila preučevana na šestih sortah hrušk na prostem v treh zaporednih letih. Sorte hrušk so bile:‘Comice’, ‘Buerre Giffard’, ‘Bonne Louise’, ‘Felestini’, ‘Shahmiveh’, in ‘Sebri’. Populacija bolšic je bila vzorčena tedensko s stresanjem vej in naključno izbiro 10 listov na drevo. Rezultati so pokazali, da so bile velikosti populacij bolšice na preučevanih sortah hrušk značilno različne (F 5, 30 = 816,18, p < 0,0001). Sorti ‘Shahmiveh’ in ‘Sebri’ sta pokazali veliko in manjšo občutljivost na okužbo s hruševo bolšico. Naravni okužbi s hruševo bolšico sta bili na sortah ‘Bonne Louise’ in ‘Sebri’ za 37,01 % in 35,8 % manjši kot na sorti ‘Shahmiveh’. Ti sorti bi lahko uporabili za križanja v žlahtniteljskih programih za razvoj odpornosti hrušk na bolšico in jih uporabili pri integriranem upravljanju z bolšico.

Ključne besede


hruševa bolšica; populacija; relativna občutljivost; sorta

Celotno besedilo:

PDF (English)

Literatura


Aksić M.M.F., Dabić D.C., Gašić U.M., Zec G.N., Vulić T.B., Tesić Z.L., Natić M.M. (2015). Polyphenolic Profile of Pear Leaves with Different Resistance to Pear Psylla (Cacopsylla pyri). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63, 7476-7486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03394

Bell R.L., Puterka G.J. (2004). Modes of host plant resistance to pear psylla: a review. Acta Horticulturae, 663, 183-188. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.663.26

Bell R.L. (2013). Host resistance to pear psylla of breeding program selections and cultivars. Horticultural Science, 48, 143-145. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.2.143

Bellini E., Nin S. (2002). Breeding for new traits in pear. Acta Horticulturae, 596, 217-224. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.596.31

Berrada S., Nguyen T.X., Lemoine J., Vanpoucke J., Fournier D. (1995). Thirteen pear species and cultivars evaluated for resistance to Cacopsylla pyri (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Environmental Entomology, 24, 1604-1607. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/24.6.1604

Braniste N., Amzar V., Radulescu M., Sugar D. (1994). Resistance sources to Psylla sp. Acta Horticulturae, 367, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.367.6

Burts E.C., Retan H.A. (1973). Detection of pear psylla. Washington State University, Cooperative Extension Service Mimeo 3069, Pullman, WA, 2 pp.

Chang J.F., Philogene B.J.R. (1976). The development and behavior of the Psylla pyricola on different rootstocks and cultivars. Phytoprotection, 57, 127-149.

Civolani S., Grandi G., Chicca M., Pasqualini E., Fano E.A., Musacchi S. (2013). Probing behaviour of Cacopsylla pyri on a resistant pear selection. Journal Applied Entomology, 137, 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12003

Emami M.S. 2016. Field evaluation of two biorational compounds in the control of pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Förster), on pear trees. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 49, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2016.1147122

Emami M.S., Shishehbor P., Karimzadeh J. (2014a). The influences of plant resistance on predation rate of Anthocoris nemoralis (Fabricius) on Cacopsylla pyricola (Förster). Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 47, 2043-2050. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.868695

Emami M.S., Shishehbor P., Karimzadeh J. (2014b). Functional response of Anthocoris nemoralis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to the pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Hemiptera: Psyllidae): effect of pear varieties. Journal of Crop Protection, 3, 597-609.

Eyles A., Jones W., Riedl K., Cipollini D., Schwartz S., Chan K., Herms D.A., Bonello P. (2007). Comparative phloem chemistry of Manchurian (F. mandshurica) and two North American ash species (F. americana and F. pennsylvanica). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33, 1430-1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9312-3

Fischer M. (2009). Pear breeding. pp.1-26. In: S. Mohan Jain and P. M. Priyadarshan [Eds.], Breeding Plantation Tree Crops: Temperate Species. Springer, New York, 290 pp.

Gerard H.C., Fett W.F., Moreau R.A., Osman F.S., Miller R.L. (1993). Chemical and enzymic investigation of the leaf cuticle of pear genotypes differing in resistance to pear psylla. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 41, 2437-2441. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00036a043

Hodkinson I.D. (2009). Life cycle variation and adaptation in jumping plant lice (Insecta: Hemiptera: Psylloidea): a global synthesis. Journal of Natural History, 43, 65-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802354167

Horton D.R., Krysan, J.L. (1991). Host acceptance behavior of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) affected by plant species, host deprivation, habituation, and egg load. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 84, 612-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/84.6.612

Horton D.R. (1990). Oviposition by overwintering morph of pear psylla (Homoptera:Psyllidae) with information on conditioning. Environmental Entomology, 19, 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/19.2.357

Horton D.R. (2008). Pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). pp. 2772-2775. In: J. L. Capinera (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Entomology. 2nd. Ed. Vols. 1-4. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 4346 pp.

Musacchi S., Ancarani V., Gamberini A., Giatti B., Sansavini S. (2005). Progress in pear breeding at the University of Bologna. Acta Horticulturae, 671, 191-194. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.671.24

Nin S., Ferri A., Sacchetti P., Picardi E., Cantini C., Giordani E. (2015). Susceptibility of European pear germplasm to Cacopsylla pyri under mediterranean climatic conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 185, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.031

Pasqualini E., Civolani S., Musacchi S., Ancarani V., Dondini L., Robert P., Baronio P. (2006). Cacopsylla pyri behaviour on new pear selections for host resistance programs. Bulletin of Insectology, 59, 27-37.

Pree D.J., Archibald K.W., Ker K.W., Cole K. J. (1990). Occurrence of Pyrethroid resistance in pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) populations in southern Ontario. Journal of Economic Entomology, 83, 2159-2163. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/83.6.2159

Quarta R., Puggioni D. (1985). Survey on the variety susceptibility to pear Psylla. Acta Horticulturae, 159, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1985.159.10

Radjabi Gh. (1989). Insects attacking rosaceous fruit trees in Iran: Homoptera. Vol. 3. Plant Pests and Diseases Research Institute, Tehran, Iran, 256 pp.

SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 5121 pp.

Shaltiel-Harpaz L., Soroker V., Kdoshim R., Hason R., Sakalsky T., Hatib K., Bar-Ya’akov I., Holland D. 2013. Two pear accessions evaluated for susceptibility to pear psylla Cacopsylla bidens (Šulc) in Israel. Pest Management Science, 70, 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3543

Sule S., Jenser G., Szita E. (2007). Management of pear decline caused by Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri in Hungary. Bulletin of Insectology, 60, 319-320.

Ullman D.E., McLean D.L. (1988). Feeding behavior of the winterform pear psylla, Psylla pyricola (Homoptera: Psyllidae), on reproductive and transitory host plants. Environmental Entomology, 17, 675-678. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/17.4.675

Westigard P.H., Allen R.B., Gut L.J. (1981). Pear psylla: relationship of early-season nymph densities to honeydew-induced fruit damage on two pear cultivars. Journal of Economic Entomology, 74, 532-534. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/74.5.532




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14720/aas.2019.114.1.5

Povratne povezave

  • Trenutno ni nobenih povratnih povezav.


Avtorske pravice (c) 2019

##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##

 

Acta agriculturae Slovenica je odprtodostopna revija, ki objavlja pod pogoji licence Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva (CC BY).

                     


eISSN 1854-1941