Občutljivostni odziv sort in lokalnih polucij belega volčjega boba na bobarja (Bruchus rufimanus Bohemann, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)

Ivelina Mitkova NIKOLOVA

Povzetek


Namen raziskave je bil ovrednoti občutljivostni odziv sort in lokalnih populacij belega volčjega boba na bobarja (Bruchus rufimanus) v poljskih poskusih v več okoljih. Stopnja poškodovanosti semen in občjutljivostni indeks sta bila ocenjena v vseh preučevanih okoljih in analizirana glede na dednost in vplive okolja. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da sta bila občutljivostni indeks in poškodovanost semen pozitivno povezana s količino padavin in vlažnostjo in negativno z minimalnimi in maksimalnimi temperaturami. Poškodovanost semen je bila pozitivno povezana s temperaturo in negativno s padavinami in vlažnostjo. Lokalna poljska populacija ‘WAT’ in sorte Pink Mutant, Solnechnii, in Bezimenii 1 so imele najmanj poškodovanih semen in so dobro uspevale v vseh preučevanih okoljih. Te sorte so imele tudi najmanše vrednosti občutljivostnega indeksa in majhno raznolikost. Neujemanje med zgodnjimi fenološkimi fazami razvoja sort Pink Mutant, Solnechnii in Bezimenii 1 in razvojnim krogom bobarja je bil eden od vzrokov za izkazano toleranco. Korelacije med poškodovanostjo semen in vrednostjo občutljivostnega indeksa kot tudi med maso 1000 semen in občutljivostnim indeksom so bile v prvem primeru močno pozitivne in v drugem negativne. Sorte WAT, Pink Mutant, Solnechnii in Bezimenii 1 so imele prednost v lastni obrambi pred napadom bobarja , zaradi česar so posebno zanimive za programe žlahtnjenja.

Ključne besede


Bruchus rufimanus; Lupinus albus; HA-GGE biplot analiza; poškodovanost semena; indeks občutljivosti

Celotno besedilo:

PDF (English)

Literatura


Anderson, M.J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

Bell, S., & Crane, E. (2016). Farming oilseed rape without neonicotinoids. Research Report Commissioned by Friends of the Earth. Retrieved from https://cdn.friendsoftheearth.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/Farming%20Oilseed%20Rape%20without%20Neonicotinoids.pdf

Bruce, T.J., Martin, J.L., Smart, L.E., & Pickett, J.A. (2011). Development of semiochemical attractants for monitoring bean seed beetle, Bruchus rufimanus. Pest Management Science, 67, 1303–1308. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2186

Ceballos, R., Fernbndez, N., Zyсiga, S., & Zapata, N. (2015). Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of pea weevil Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) to volatiles collected from its host Pisum sativum L. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 75, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392015000200009

Delobel, B., & Delobel, A. (2006). Dietary specialisation in European species groups of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Bruchinae). Oecologia, 149, 428-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0461-9

Ebedah, I.M.A., Mahmoud, Y.A., & Moawad, S.S. (2006). Susceptibility of some faba bean cultivars to field infestations with some insect pests. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2, 537-540.

Elden, T.C. (2000). Effects of proteinase inhibitors and plant lectins on the adult alfalfa beetle (Coleoptera: Curculinoidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 35, 62−69. https://doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-35.1.62

Gabriel, K.R. (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58, 453–467. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334381

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., & Ryanh, P.D. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf

Harris, B.M. (1980). Insects associated with the lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) cultivars fest and uniharvest. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury, Lincoln College, New Zealand, pp. 248.

Hasan, F., & Ansari, S. (2016). Temperature-dependent development and demography of Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Parthenium hysterophorus. Annals of Applied Biology, 168, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12244

Hurej, M., Twardowski, J.P., & Kozak, M. (2013). Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) assemblages in the fields of narrow-leafed lupin sown as pure stand and intercropped with spring triticale. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 100(4), 393‒400. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2013.100.050

Keneni, G., Bekele, E., Getu, E., Imtiaz, M., Damte, T., Mulatu, B., & Dagne, K. (2011). Breeding Food Legumes for Resistance to Storage Insect Pests: Potential and Limitations. Sustainability, 3(9), 1399-1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3091399

Kutcherov, D. (2015). Temperature dependent development in Chrysomela vigintipunctata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a stenothermal early-season breeder. Journal of Thermal Biology, 53, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2015.08.001

Kuzmova, K. (2002). World agro-climatic analogues of Bulgaria on the conditions of cultivation of peas. Jubilee session „120 years of agricultural science in Sadovo“, 113-118.

Makarem, H.A.E., Kholy, S.E.E., Abdel-Latif, A., & Seif, A.I. (2017). Effect of some botanical oils on the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Egyptian Journal of Experimental Biology (Zoology), 13(2), 273 – 282. https://doi.org/10.5455/egysebz.20171025013938

Mansoor, M.M., Afzal, M., Raza, A.B.M., Akram, Z., Waqar, A., & Afzal, M.B.S. (2015). Post-exposure temperature influence on the toxicity of conventional and new chemistry insecticides to green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 22, 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.10.008

Mateus, C., Mexia, A., Duarte, I., Pereira, G., & Tavares de Sousa, M. (2011). Evaluation of damage caused by bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on peas (Pisum sativum L.). Acta Horticulturae, 917, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.917.15

Ramos, R.Y., & Fernández-Carrillo, E. (2011). Life cycle and behaviour of the lupine seed beetle, Bruchidius rubiginosus (Desbrochers, 1869) in the Iberian Peninsula (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 31 (12), 253‒259. Retrieved from: http://sea-entomologia.org/Publicaciones/PDF/BOLN_49/253259BSEA49Bruchidiusrubiginosusciclo.pdf

Roubinet, E. (2016). Management of the broad bean weevil (Bruchus rufimanus Boh.) in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). Technical report. Retrieved from https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/13631/1/roubinet_e_160704.pdf

Rubiales, D., Flores, F., Emeran, A.A., Kharrat, M., Amri, M., Rojas-Molina, M.M., & Sillero, J.C. (2014). Identification and multi-environment validation of resistance against broomrapes (Orobanche crenata and Orobanche foetida) in faba bean (Vicia faba). Field Crops Research, 166, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.010

Sánchez-Martín, J., Rubiales, D., Flores, F., Emeran, A.A., Shtaya, M.J.Y., Sillero, J.C., Allagui, M.B., & Prats, E. (2014). Adaptation of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars to autumn sowings in Mediterranean environments. Field Crops Research, 156, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.018

Scarafoni, A., Consonni, A., Galbusera, V., Negri, A., Tedeschi, G., Rasmussen, P., Magni, C., & Duranti, M. (2008). Identificaion and characterization of a Bowman-Birk inhibitor active towards trypsin but not chymotrypsin in Lupinus albus seeds. Phytochemistry, 69, 1820−1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.03.023

Sharma, P., Nath, A.K., Kumari, R., & Bhardwaj, S.V. (2012). Purification, characterization and evaluation of insecticidal activity of trypsin inhibitor from Albizia lebbeck seeds. Journal of Forestry Research, 23(1), 131−137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0243-7

Shazali, M.E.H. (1989). The susceptibility of faba bean and other seed legumes to infestation by Bruchidius incarnatus (BOH,) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F,) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). AGRIS since: 1989. Retrieved from http://agris,fao,org/agris-search/search,do?recordID=QV8900071

Southgate, B.J. (1979). Biology of the Bruchidae. Annual Review of Entomology. 24. 449-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.24.010179.002313

Stewart AJA, Bantock TM, Beckmann BC, Botham MS, Hubble D, & Roy DB. (2015). The role of ecological interactions in determining species ranges and range changes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115, 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12543

Ströcker, K., Wendt, S., Kirchner, W.H., & Struck, Ch. (2013). Feeding preference of the weevils Sitona gressorius and Sitona griseus on different lupin genotypes and the role of alkaloids. Arthropod–Plant Interact, 7, 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-013-9273-0

Szafirowska, A. (2012). The role of cultivars and sowing date in control of broad bean weevil (Bruchus rufimanus Boh.) in organic cultivation. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 77, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-012-0013-2

Ward, R.L. (2018). The biology and ecology of Bruchus rufimanus (bean seed beetle). Ph.D. tesses, Newcastle University England.

Yan, W., & Holland, J.B. (2010). A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica, 171, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0030-5

Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40, 597–605. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x

Yan, W. (2001). GGEbiplot—a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x

Yan, W., & Rajcan, I. (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42, 1, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0011

Zhou, Z., Guo, J., Chen, H., & Wan, F. (2010). Effects of temperature on survival, development, longevity, and fecundity of Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a potential biological control agent against Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asterales: Asteraceae). Environmental Entomology, 39, 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09176




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14720/aas.2021.117.2.1855

Povratne povezave

  • Trenutno ni nobenih povratnih povezav.


Avtorske pravice (c) 2021

##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##

 

Acta agriculturae Slovenica je odprtodostopna revija, ki objavlja pod pogoji licence Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva (CC BY).

                     


eISSN 1854-1941