Pošlji prispevek (e-pošta) Učinki gnojenja na rast in pridelek zrnja na proteinih obogatene koruze v razmerah sušnega stresa, Ibadan, Nigeria
Povzetek
Suša in slaba rodovitnost tal sta v globalnem obsegu glavna dejavnika, ki omejujeta produktivnost gojenih rastlin. Za preučevanje vpliva vodnega deficita (WS) in dodajanja hranil v tla (SA) na rast in pridelek koruze je bil izveden dvoletni faktorski poljski poskus na sorti ILE-1-OB, bogati na proteinih (QPM) in na sušo odporni sorti TZPBSR-W kot kontroli, ki ni obogatena s proteini (non QPM), v Ibidanu, Nigerija. Obravnavanja so obsegala: šest načinov gnojenja (50 in 100 (kg N ha-1) zNPK-20-10-10, 10,7 kg N ha-1 komposta iz vrste Tithonia pomešanega s kokošjim gnojem (TPC), 50 N + 10,7 TPC in 100 N + 10,7 TPC (kg N ha-1), tri stopnje vodnega deficita (WS) v vegetativni (STR1) in reproduktivni fazi (STR2) in kontrolo s polnim namakanjem. Listna površina (LA) in pridelek zrnja (GY) sta bila izmerjena s standardnimi metodami. Listna površina je v vegetativni fazi ob pomanjkanju vode znašala 458,90 ± 12,4 cm2, ob polnem zalivanju pa 598,81 ± 13,1 cm2. Pridelek zrnja je ob vodnem deficitu v reproduktivni fazi znašal 2,94 ± 0,2 t ha-1, pri polnem zalivanju pa 6,59 ± 0,2 t ha-1. Listna površina je bila glede na načine gnojenja sledeča: 0 N (397,65 cm2), 100 N + 10,7 TPC (622,71 cm2) in 50 N + 10,7 TPC (611,03 cm2). Pridelek zrnja je glede na načine gnojenja dosegel naslednje vrednosti: 0 N (2,37 t ha-1), 100 N + 10,7 TPC (5,82 t ha-1) in 50 N + 10,7 TPC (5,26 t ha-1). Sušni stres je zmanjšal rast in pridelek sorte QPM, gnojenje s 50 kg N ha-1 kot anorganskim gnojilom dopolnjeno z 10,7 kg N ha-1 v organski obliki je pospešilo rast in pridelek zrnja koruze v razmerah vodnega deficita.
Ključne besede
Celotno besedilo:
PDF (English)Literatura
Abayomi, Y. A., & Abidoye, T.O. (2009). Evaluation of cowpea genotypes for soil moisture stress tolerance under screen house conditions. African Journal of Plant Science, 3(10), 229-237. Online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJPS
Abedi, T., Alemzadeh, A., & Kazemeni, S.A. (2010). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on grain yield and protein banding pattern of wheat. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4, 384-389.
Alvarez Prado, S., Sadras, V.O., & Borras, L. (2014). Independent genetic control of maize (Zea mays) kernel weight determination and its phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65, 4479–4487. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru215
Ammani, A.A., Ja’afaru, A.K., Aliyu, J.A., & Arab, A.I. (2012). Climate change and maize production: Empirical evi-dence from Kaduna State. Journal of Agricultural Extension
Nigeria, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v16i1.1
Anjorin, F.B. (2018). Effects of water deficit stress, inorganic and organic fertilizers on growth and yield performance of quality Protein maize. Ph.D dissertation University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
Anjorin, F.B., Adejumo, S.A., Are, K.S., & Ogunniyan, D. J. (2017). Seedling establishment, biomass yield and water use efficiencies of four maize varieties as influenced by water deficit stress. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova, 50(2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/cerce-2017-0012
Anjum S. A., Xie, X., Wang, L., Saleem, M. F., Man, C., & Wang. L. (2011). Morphological, physiological and bio-chemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(9), 2026-2032.
Annonymous, (2013).Corn Growth Stages Channel.com Technology Development & Agronomy, Musanto
Araus, J. L., Slafer, G.A., Royo, C., & Serret, M.D. (2008). Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in ce-reals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 27(6), 377–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680802467736
Bolaños, J., & Edmeades, G.O. (1996). The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tol-erance in tropical maize. Field Crops Research, 48, 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00036-6
Borra’s, L., Westgate, M.E., & Otegui, M. E. (2003). Control of kernel weight and kernel water relation by post-flowering source-sink ratio in maize. Annals of Botany, 91, 857-867. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg090
Carpici, E.B. (2009). Evaluation of the effects of plant densities and nitrogen rates on stress physiology traits in silage corn (Zea mays L.) production. PhD thesis, Field Crops, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Uludag Universi-ty, Bursa, Turkey
Cazetta, J.O., Seebauer, J. R., & Below, F.E. (1999). Sucrose and nitrogen supplies regulate growth of maize ker-nels. Annals of Botany, 84, 747-754. Article No. anbo.1999.0976, available online at http:}}www.idealibrary.com on. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0976
Chaves, M.M., Pereira, J.S., Maroco, J., Rodriques, M.L., Ricardo, M.L., Osorio, M.L., Carvatho, I., Faria, T., & Pinheiro, C. (2002). How plants cope with water stress in the field photosynthesis and growth? Annals of Botany, 89, 907–916. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf105
Denmead, O.T., & Shaw, R.H. (1960). The effects of soil moisture stress at different stages of growth on the de-velopment and yield of corn. Agronomy Journal, 52, 272–277. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1960.00021962005200050010x
Edmeades, G.O. (2013). Progress in achieving and delivering tolerance in maize. An update, SAAA Ithaca, NY. Global Sta-tus of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 1- 4.
Duvnjak, M., Kljak, K., & Grbeša, D. (2021). Nitrogen Storage in Crops: Case Study of Zeins in Maize. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen. 95380. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95380
Edmeades, G.O., J. Bolaños, S.C. Chapman, H.R. Lafitte., & Bänziger, M. (1999). Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels. Crop Science, 39(4), 1306–1315. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3951306x
Efthimiadou, A., Bilalis, D., Karkanis, A., & Froud-Williams, B. (2010). Combined organic/inorganic fertilization enhance soil quality and increased yield, photosynthesis and sustainability of sweet maize crop. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(9), 722-729.
Eghball, B., & Maranville, J.W. (1991). Interactive effects of water and nitrogen stresses on nitrogen utilization efficiency, leaf water status and yield of corn genotypes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 22, 1367-1382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629109368498
Farré, I., & Faci, J.M. (2009). Deficit irrigation in maize for reducing agricultural water use in a Mediterranean envi-ronment. Agricultural Water Management, 96(3), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.07.002
Fatemi, R., Kahraryan, B., Ghanbary, A., & Valizadeh, M. (2006). The evaluation of different irrigation regimes and water requirement on yield and yield components of corn. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 12(1), 133-141.
Fernhill, (2011). Difference between compost and fertilizer. Retrieved online fernhillcompost.com, 3(15), 427-2821.
Francis, C.A., Rutger, J. N., & Palmer, A. F. E. (1969). Rapid method for plant leaf area estimation in maize (Zea mays L.) Crop science, 9(5), 537-539. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900050005x
Gheysari, M., Mirlatifi, S.M., Bannayan, M., Homaee, M., & Hoogenboomb, G. (2009). Interaction of water and nitrogen on maize grown for silage. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 809-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.11.003
Goldblatt, A. (2010). Agriculture: Facts and Trends, South Africa. Retrieved from http://aWSRssets.wwf.org.za/downloads/facts_brochure on 12/06/2017, 1-32.
Grant, R.F., Jackson, B.C., Kiniry, J.R., & Arkin, G.F. (1989). Water deficit timing effects on yield components in maize. Agronomy Journal, 81, 61-65. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100010011x
Hammad, H.M., Ahmad, A.A., Wajid, A., & Akhter, J. (2011). Maize response to time and rate of nitrogen applica-tion. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43(4), 1935-1942.
Hargurdeep, S. S., & Westgate, M. E. (2000). Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Advances in Agronomy, 68(1), 59-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60843-3
Hokmalipour, S., Shiri-e-Janagard, M., Darbandi, M.H., Peyghami-e-Ashenaee, F., Hasanzadeh, M., Seiedi, M.N., & Shabani, R. (2010). Comparison of agronomical nitrogen use efficiency in three cultivar of corn as affect-ed by nitrogen fertilizer levels. World Applied Science Journal, 8(10), 1168-1174. http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1070340/the_effects_of_shortterm_compost
Hufsteler, E.V., Boerma, H.R., Carter, T.E., & Earl, H.J. (2007). Genotypic variation for three physiological traits affecting drought tolerance in soybean. Crop Science, 47, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0243
Imadi, S.R., Gul, A., Dikilitas, M., Karakas, S., Sharma, I., & Ahmad P. (2016). Water stress: types, causes, and im-pact on plant growth and development. In: Ahmad P, ed. Water Stress and Crop Plants. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 343-355. doi: 10.1002/9781119054450.ch21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119054450.ch21
Jongdee, B., Fukai, S., & Cooper, M. (2002). Leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment as physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in rice. Field Crops Research, 76, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00036-9
Khalili, M., Moghaddam, M., Kazemi Arbat, H., Shakiba, M.R., Kanooni, H., & Choukan, R. (2010). Effect of drought stress on different corn genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(20), 67-84.
Kuscu, H. (2010). Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of maize grown under Bursa conditions. PhD thesis, Irrigation and Agricultural Structures, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Mansouri-Far, C.S.A., Sanavy, M.M., & Saberali, S.F. (2010). Maize yield response to deficit irrigation during low sensitive growth stages and nitrogen rate under semi-arid climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 97(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.003
Monneveux, P.C., Sánchez, D., Beck, C., & Edmeades, G.O. (2006). Drought improvement in maize source popula-tion: evidence of progress. Crop Science, 41, 180-191. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.04-0034
Ngetich, F.K., Shisanya, C.A., Mugwe, J., Mucheru-Muna, M., & Mugendi, D. (2012). The Potential of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources in Sub-Saharan African Crop Farming Systems - A Global Perspective, Dr. Joann Whalen (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-945-5, In Tech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/soil-fertility-improvement-and integrated-nutrient-management-a-global-perspective on 04/06/2016,Pp 1 -27.
Ogola, J.B.O., Wheeler, T.R., & Harris, P.M. (2002). Effects of nitrogen and irrigation on water use of maize crops. Field Crops Research, 78, 105-117. www.elselvier.com. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00116-8
Pandey, R.K., Marienville, J.W., & Adum, A. (2000). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effect on maize in a Sahelian environment. I .Grain yield components. Agricultural Water Management, 46, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00073-1
Paponov, I.A., Sambo, P., Erley, G.S.A., Presterl, T., Geiger, H.H., & Engels, C. (2005). Kernel set in maize geno-types differing in nitrogen use efficiency in response to resource availability around flowering. Plant and Soil, 272, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-4210-8
Ritchie, S.W., Hanway, J.J., & Benson, G.O. (1993). How a Corn Plant Develops. Iowa State Univ. p. Rpt. No. 48. Avail-able online at http://maize.agron.iastate.edu/corngrows.html
Rufino, C.A., Fernandes-Vieira, J., Martín-Gil, J., Júnior, J.S.A., Tavares, L.C., Fernandes-Correa, M., & Martín-Ramos, P. (2018). Water stress influence on the vegetative period yield components of different maize geno-types. Agronomy, 8(8),
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8080151
Sah, R.P., Chakraborty, M., Prasad, K. et al. (2020). Impact of water deficit stress in maize: Phenology and yield components. Scientific Report, 10, 2944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59689-7
Sanginga, N., & Woomer, P. L. (2009). Integrated soil fertility management in Africa: principles, practices and developmental process. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of the International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Nairobi, 1-263.
Scoones, I., & Toulmin, C. (1998). Soil nutrient balances: What use for policy? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 71, 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00145-5
Smale, M., Byerlee, D., & Jayne, T.S. (2011). Maize Revolutions In Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5659, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5659
STAR, (2014). Statistical Tool For Agricultural Research Version version 2.0.1 Biometrics and Breeding Informatics, PBGB Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños,Laguna.
Tambone, F., Genevini, P.D., &’Imporzano, G.A. (2007). The effects of short-term compost application on soil chemical properties and on nutritional status of maize plant. Compost Science and Utilization, 15(3), 176-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2007.10702330
Tan, Z. X., Lal, R., & Wiebe, K. D. (2005). Global soil nutrient depletion and yield reduction. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 26(1), 123-146. Available online at http://www.haworthpress.com/web/JSA. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v26n01_10
Uhart, S.A., & Andrade, F.H. (1995). Nitrogen deficiency in maize. II.Carbon–nitrogen interaction effects on kernel number and grain yield. Crop Science, 35, 1384–1389. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050021x
Uribelarrea, M., Carcova, J., Otegui, M.E., & Westgate, M.E. (2002). Pollen production, pollination dynamics, and kernel set in maize. Crop Science, 42, 1910–1918. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1910
Vanlauwe, B., Descheemaeke, K., & Giller, K.E et al. (2015). Integrated soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa: unravelling local adaptation. Soil, 1, 1239–1286. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-491-2015
Xu, Z.Z., Yu, Z.W., Wang, D., & Zhang, Y.L. (2005). Water use water Kisintili applications to yield. Turkish nitrogen accumulation and translocation for winter. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23, 233-241.
Zemánek, P. (2011). Evaluation of compost influence on soil water retention. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silvicul-turae Mendelianae Brunensis, 54(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159030227
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14720/aas.2021.117.4.1887
Povratne povezave
- Trenutno ni nobenih povratnih povezav.
Avtorske pravice (c) 2021
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-nd4.footer##
Acta agriculturae Slovenica je odprtodostopna revija, ki objavlja pod pogoji licence Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva (CC BY).
eISSN 1854-1941