Vpliv velikosti in staranja semena navadne leče (Lens culinaris Medik.) na njeno uspevanje v poljskem poskusu pri različnih režimih namakanja

Kazem GHASSEMI-GOLEZANI, Afsaneh CHADORDOOZ-JEDDI, Saeid ZEHTAB-SALMASI

Povzetek


Semena navadne leče (Lens culinaris ‘Kimia’) so bila pred setvijo razdeljena na večji podvzorec (S1) in manjšega, ki je bil razdeljen na velika (S2) in mala (S3) semena. Podvzorec semen vseh velikost je bil vzet kot kontrola, oziroma kot vitalna semena (A1), ostala dva podvzorca semen sta bila umetno starana 2 in 4 dni (A2 in A3, vzorca). Uspevanje semen je bilo v poljskem poskusu ovrednoteno v sezonah 2011 in 2012. Komponente pridelka in pridelka zrnja leče so upadale z zmanjševanjem dostopnosti vode. Največje vrednosti komponent pridelka (razen mase 1000 zrn) in pridelka zrnja na enoto površine so bile dosežene z rastlinami iz velikih semen. Superiornost rastlin iz velikih semen v pridelku zrnja je bila še bolj očitna v razmereh omejenega namakanja v primerjavi z dobro zalitimi rastlinami. Staranje semen je povzročilo slabšo vzpostavitev sestoja posevka in posledično manjši pridelek zrnja na enoto površine. Rastline iz velikih semen so imele manjše zmanjšanje pridelka na enoto površine v primerjavi s tistimi iz staranih manjših semen in semen enotnega vzorca. Izgleda, da setev velikih semen pri navadni leči nekako zmanjša škodljive učinke sušnega stresa in staranja semen na pridelku zrnja na enoto površine.


Ključne besede


pridelek zrnja; navadna leča; staranje semen; velikost semen; sušni stres

Celotno besedilo:

PDF (English)

Literatura


Al-Karaki G.N. 1998. Seed size and water potential effects on water uptake, germination and growth of lentil. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 181, 237–242. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439- 037X.1998.tb00423.x

ASPB, 2003. Regulations on the sale of planting seed in Arkansas. Arkansas State Plant Board, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Bailly C., Benamar A., Corbineau F., Come D. 1998. Free radical scavenging as affected by accelerated ageing and subsequent priming in sunflower seeds. Plant Physiology, 104, 646–652. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1040418.x

Chartzoulakis K., Noitsakis B., Therios I. 1993. Photosynthesis, plant growth and dry matter distribution in kiwifruit as influenced by water deficits. Irrigation Science, 14, 1–5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00194999

Eriksson O. 1999. Seed size variation and its effect on germination and seedling performance in the clonal herb Convallaria majalis. Acta Oecologiaca, 20, 61–66. DOI: 10.1016/S1146-609X(99)80016-2

Fujikura Y., Karssen C.M. 1995. Molecular studies on osmoprimed seeds of cauliflower: a partial amino acid sequence of a vigour -related protein and osmopriming-enhanced expression of putative aspartic protease. Seed Science and Research, 5, 177–181. DOI: 10.1017/S0960258500002804

Fulai L., Christian R., Jensena M., Andersenb N. 2004. Drought stress effect on carbohydrate concentration in soybean leaves and pods during early reproductive stages: its implication in altering pod set. Field Crops and Research, 86, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00165-5

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Dalil B., Moghaddam M., Raey Y. 2011. Field performance of differentially deteriorated seed lots of maize (Zea mays ) under different irrigation treat ments. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39, 160–163.

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Hosseinzadeh-Mahootchy A., Zehtab-Salmasi S., Tourchi M. 2012. Improving field performance of aged chickpea seeds by hydro- priming under water stress. International Journal of Plant Animal Environmental Sciences, 2, 168–176.

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Khomari S., Dalil B., Hosseinzadeh-Mahootchy A., Chadordooz-Jeddi A. 2010. Effects of seed aging on field performance of winter oil-seed rape. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 8, 175–178.

Ghassemi-Golezani K., Gh anehpoor S., Dabbagh Mohammadi-Nasab A. 2009. Effects of water limitation on growth and grain filling of faba bean cultivars. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 7, 442–447.

Hsu J.L., Sung J.M. 1997. Antioxidant role of glutathione associated w ith accelerated aging and hydration of triploid watermelon seeds. Plant Physiology, 100, 967–974. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399- 3054.1997.tb00024.x

Hu Y., Schmidhalter U. 1998. Spatial distributions of inorganic ions and carbohy drates contributing to osmotic adjustment in the elongating wheat leaf under saline conditions. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 25, 591–597. DOI: 10.1071/PP97162

International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). 2010. International rules for seed testing, Seed vigor testing. Chapter 15: 1–57.

Kamel A., Loser D.M. 1995. Contribution of carbohydrates and other solutes to osmotic adjustment in wheat leaves under water stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 145, 363–366. DOI: 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81903-6

Kim S.H., Bin Y.H., Choe Z.R. 1989. The use of multiple seed vigor indices to predict field emergence and grain yield of naked and malting barley. Journal of Crop Science, 34, 134–141.

Kim J.Y., Mahe A., Brangeon J., Prioul J.L. 2000. A maize vacuolar invertase, IVR2, is induced by water stress. Organ/tissue specificity and diurnal modulation of expression. Plant Physiology, 124, 71–84. DOI: 10.1104/pp.124.1.71

Krannitz P.G., Aarssen L.W., Dow J.M. 1999. The effect of genetically base d differences in seed size on seedling survival in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 78, 446–450. DOI: 10.2307/2444967

Kriedemann P.E., Barrs H.D. 1981. Citrus orchards . In: Water Deficit and Plant Growth. Kozlowski T.T, (ed.). New York, Academic Press: 325–417.

Leishman M.R., Westoby M. 1994. The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence. Functional Ecology, 8, 205–214. DOI: 10.2307/2389903

Lloret F.C., Casanovas C., Pen ̃ uelas J. 1999. Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root: shoot ration, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology, 13, 210–216. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00309.x

Manga V.K., Yadav O.P. 1995. Effect of seed size on developmental traits adaptability to tolerate drought in pearl millet. Journal of Arid Environments, 29, 169–172. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80087-4

McDonald M.B. 1999. Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Science and Technology, 27, 177–237.

Moles A.T., Westoby M. 2004. What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size? Oikos, 106, 193–199. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13101.x

Osborne D.J. 1983. Biochemical control systems operating in the early hours of germination. Canadian Journal of Botany, 61, 3568–3577. DOI: 10.1139/b83-406

Osunkoja O.O., Ash J.E., Hopkins M.S., Graham A.W. 1994. Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade-tolerance of rain-forest tree species in northern Qu eensland. Journal of Ecology, 82, 149–163. DOI: 10.2307/2261394

Pereira J.S., Chaves M.M. 1995. Plant responses to drought under climate change in mediterranean- type ecosystems. In: Global Change and Mediterranean-type Ecosytems. Moreno J.M., Oechel W.C. (eds.). Ecological studies, New York, Springer-Verlag: 140–160.

Rao S.K. 1981. Influence of seed size on field germination, seedling vigor, yield and quality of self-pollinated crops: a review. Agricultural Review, 2, 95–101.

Royo C., Ramdani A., Moragues M., Villegas D. 2006. Durum wheat bunder Mediterranean conditions as affected by seed size. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 192, 257–266. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439- 037X.2006.00215.x

Saha R.R., Sultana W. 2008. Influence of seed ageing on growth and yield of soybean. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 37, 21–26. DOI: 10.3329/bjb.v37i1.1559

Schimpf D.J. 1977. Seed weight of Amaranthus retroflexus in relation to moisture and lengthof growing season. Ecology, 58, 450–453. DOI: 10.2307/1935621

Seiwa K. 2000. Effects of seed size and emergence time on tree seedling establishment importance of developmental constraints. Oecologia, 123, 208– 215. DOI: 10.1007/s004420051007

Szilagyi L. 2003. Influence of drought on seed yield components in common bean, Blug. Journal of Plant Physiology Speci al, Issue, 320–330.

D.M., Egli D.B. 1991. Relationship of seed vigor to crop yield: A Review. Crop Science, 31, 816–822.

Trawatha S.E., Tekrony D.M., Hidebrand D.F. 1995. Relationship of soybean seed quality to fatty acid and C6–Aldehyde levels during storage. Crop Science, 35, 1415–22. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050026x

Vaughton G., Ramsey M. 1998. Sources and consequences of seed mass variation in Banksia marginata (Proteaceae). Journal of Ecology, 86, 563–573. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00279.x

Vieira R.D., Paiva-Aguero J.A., Perecin D., Bittencourt S. 1999. Correlation of electrical conductivity and other vigor tests with field emergence of soybean seedlings. Seed Science and Technology, 27, 67– 75.

Wulff R.D., Causin H.F., Benitez O., Bacalini P.A. 1999. Intraespecific variability and maternal effects in the response to nutrient addition in Chenopodium album. Canadian Journal of Botany, 77, 1150– 1158. DOI: 10.1139/b99-124




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14720/aas.2014.103.2.1

Povratne povezave

  • Trenutno ni nobenih povratnih povezav.


Avtorske pravice (c) 2014 Acta agriculturae Slovenica

 

Acta agriculturae Slovenica je odprtodostopna revija, ki objavlja pod pogoji licence Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva (CC BY).

                     


eISSN 1854-1941