Assessing government grants: evidence from greenhouse tomato and pepper farmers in Kosovo



Genetic matching with an evolutionary algorithm was applied to evaluate the impact of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development (MAFRD) grant programs to support greenhouse vegetable production in Kosovo. The primary contribution of the paper is to assess whether grants have an impact on the farmers’ gross seasonal revenue after matching similar grantees to non-grantees. The findings showed that greenhouse tomato grantees make 2,151.80 euros more per growing season in comparison to the non-grantees (95 % confidence interval -324.71 to 4,628.31 euros). Similarly, greenhouse pepper grantees make 2,866.69 euros more per growing season compared to non-grantees (95 % confidence interval 446.42 to 5,286.96 euros). The study identified farmers’ education and region as important matching variables which may be of interest to policy researchers in Kosovo.


greenhouse economics; genetic matching; government farm grants; Kosovo agriculture

Full Text:



Ahmed, U. I., Ying, L., Bashir, M. K., Abid, M., Elahi, E. and Iqbal, M. A. (2016). Access to output market by small farmers: The case of Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 26(3), 787–793.

Ali, A., Sharif, M., Mahmood, K. and Akmal, N. (2013). Determinants of cherry production and marketing in Pakistan: A propensity score matching approach. Agricultural Economics Review, 14(1).

Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31–72, doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x

D'Agostino, R. B. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2265-2281, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B

Dehejia, R. H. and Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151–161, doi:10.1162/003465302317331982

Diamond, A. and Sekhon, J. S. (2013). Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 932–945, doi:10.1162/REST_a_00318

Fîntîneru, G. and Madsen, O. (2012). Farmers' education and farm productivity. Evidence from Denmark and from Romania. AgroLife Scientific Journal, 2(1), 175–180.

Kaciu, S. (2008). Study of the current situation of pepper production in Kosovo. Retrieved from

Kaciu, S., Babaj, I., Aliu, S. and Demaj, I. (2016). Potential of protected vegetable production in Kosovo and future perspectives. Acta Hortic, 1142, 461–466, doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1142.70

Ling, C. and Newman, L. L. (2011). Untangling the Food Web: Farm-to-market distances in British Columbia, Canada. Local Environment, 16, 807–822, doi:10.1080/13549839.2010.539602

Martinovska Stojcheska A., Georgiev, N. and Erjavec, E. (2008). Farm income analysis of agricultural holdings in Macedonia using FADN methodology. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 92(1), 41-51.

Miftari, I., Hoxha, B. and Gjokaj, E. (2016). Kosovo*: Agricultural policy brief (CAPB). Joint Research Centre: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS).

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development. (2016). Green report. Retrieved from

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development. (2017). Green report. Retrieved from

Panda, S. (2015). Farmer education and household agricultural income in rural India. International Journal of Social Economics, 42, 514–529, doi:10.1108/IJSE-12-2013-0278

Ruiz, D., Stout, D. and Herlihy, C. (2017). Use of genetic matching in program evaluation: The case of RAD. Cityscape, 19(2), 337–349.

Sekhon, J. S. (2011). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The Matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 1–52. doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i07

Stuart, E. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science: A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25(1), 1–21, doi:10.1214/09-STS313

Stuart, E. and Rubin, D. B. (2008). Best Practices in Quasi–Experimental Designs: Matching Methods for Causal Inference. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Terza, J. V., Basu, A. and Rathouz, P. J. (2008). Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling, Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 531–543, doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.009



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Arben Musliu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Acta agriculturae Slovenica is an Open Access journal published under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY License.


eISSN 1854-1941