Vpliv uporabe biopesticidov na osnovi bakterije Pseudomonas fluorescens in glive Trichoderma harzianum na propad in kakovost plodov ananasa

Diego Mauricio CANO-REINOSO, Loekas SOESANTO, Kharisun KHARISUN, Condro WIBOWO

Povzetek


V raziskavi je bil preučevan učinek uporabe biopesticidov na osnovi vrst Pseudomonas fluorescens in Trichoderma harzianum na propad in kakovost plodov ananasa. Poskus je bil izveden kot faktorski poskus z deljenkami, kjer je prvi dejavnik obsegal dva načina vnosa patogena (pršenje in injeciranje), drugi pa naslednja štiri obravnavana: A (kontrola: brez uporabe biopesticidov), B (uporaba Bio P32 13 tednov pred pobiranjem), C (uporaba Bio T10 13 tednov pred pobiranjem) in D (uporaba Bio P32 + Bio T10 13 tednov pred pobiranjem). Inokuliran patogen je bila bakterija Dickeya zeae. Po obravnavanjih so bili določeni naslednji parametri: pojav propada plodov, vsebnost topnih snovi v plodovih in njihova celukopna kislost, vsebnost saharoze, askorbinske kisline in mineralov ter puščanje elktrolitov iz plodov. Injeciranje patogena je povzročilo večji propad plodov kot pršenje. Obravnavanji C in D sta dali najbojše rezultate z najmanjšim propadanjem plodov (pri pršenju 5 in 1,7 %, pri injeciranju 20 % v obeh primerih), veliko vsebnostjo antioksidantov (vsebnost askorbinske kisline), mineralov (kot vsebnost Ca in Mg), manjšo vsebnost elektrolitov v iztoku (v poprečju manj kot 70 % ) in bolj zdrave celične stene. Obravnavanji A in B sta bili glede na prej naštete parametre manj učinkoviti in sta pospešili propadanje plodov, posebej še pri injeciranju patogena, kar je bilo tudi bolj škodljivo glede na fiziološke lastnosti plodov. Zaključimo lahko, da uporaba biopesticidov zmanjša propadanje plodov in pozitivno vpliva na njihovo kakovost.


Ključne besede


biopesticidi; Dickeya zeae; kakovost plodov; pojav bolezni; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Trichoderma harzianum

Celotno besedilo:

PDF (English)

Literatura


Aeny, T. N., Suharjo, R., Ginting, C., Hapsoro, D. W. I., & Niswati, A. (2020). Characterization and host range assessment of Dickeya zeae associated with pineapple soft rot disease in east Lampung, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 21(2), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210221

Akram, N. A., Shafiq, F., & Ashraf, M. (2017). Ascorbic acid-a potential oxidant scavenger and its role in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00613

Barral, B., Chillet, M., Minier, J., Léchaudel, M., & Schorr-Galindo, S. (2017). Evaluating the response to Fusarium ananatum inoculation and antifungal activity of phenolic acids in pineapple. Fungal Biology, 121(12), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2017.09.002

Bartholomew, D. P., & Sanewski, G. M. (2018). Inflorescence and Fruit Development and Yield. In G. M. Sanewski, D. P. Bartholomew, & R. E. Paull (Eds.), The pineapple: botany, production and uses (pp. 223–268). London, UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786393302.0233

Benton-Jones, J. J. (2001). Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. New York, USA: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420025293

Bin Thalip, Amar Ahmadi, Tong P.S., & Casey Ng. (2015). The MD2 “Super Sweet” pineapple (Ananas comosus). Utar Agriculture Science Journal, 1(4), 14–17.

Cano-Reinoso, D. M., Soesanto, L., Kharisun, & Wibowo, C. (2021). Review: Fruit collapse and heart rot disease in pineapple: Pathogen characterization , ultrastructure infections of plant and cell mechanism resistance. Biodiversitas, 22(5), 2477–2488. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220504

Cano-Reinoso, D. M., Soesanto, L. Kharisun, & Wibowo, C. (2022a). Effect of pre-and postharvest treatments with salicylic acid on physicochemical properties of pineapple cv. MD2. Chiang Mai University Journal of Natural Sciences, 21(3), e2022039. https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJNS.2022.039

Cano-Reinoso, D. M., Kharisun, K., Soesanto, L., & Wibowo, C. (2022b). Effect of calcium and silicon fertilization after flowering on pineapple mineral status and flesh translucency. Plant Physiology Reports, 27(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-022-00651-2

Carillo, P., Woo, S. L., Comite, E., El-nakhel, C., Rouphael, Y., Fusco, G. M., Borzacchiello, A., Lanzuise, S., & Vinale, F. (2020). Application of Trichoderma harzianum, 6-pentyl-α-pyrone and plant biopolymer formulations modulate plant metabolism and fruit quality of plum tomatoes. Plants, 9(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060771

Chen, C. C., & Paull, R. E. (2001). Fruit temperature and crown removal on the occurrence of pineapple fruit translucency. Scientia Horticulturae, 88(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00201-6

Chen, N. J., & Paull, R. E. (2017). Production and postharvest handling of low acid hybrid pineapple. Acta Horticulturae, 1166, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1166.4

Chen, N. J., Paull, R. E., Chen, C. C., & Saradhuldhat, P. (2009). Pineapple production for quality and postharvest handling. Acta Horticulturae, 822, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.822.31

De Freitas, S. T., & Resender Nassur, R. C. M. (2017). Calcium treatments. In S. Pareek (Ed.), Novel postharvest treatments of fresh produce (pp. 52–68). Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370149-3

Demidchik, V., Straltsova, D., Medvedev, S. S., Pozhvanov, G. A., Sokolik, A., & Yurin, V. (2014). Stress-induced electrolyte leakage: The role of K+-permeable channels and involvement in programmed cell death and metabolic adjustment. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(5), 1259–1270. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru004

Ding, P., & Syazwani, S. (2016). Physicochemical quality, antioxidant compounds and activity of MD-2 pineapple fruit at five ripening stages. International Food Research Journal, 23(2), 549–555.

Ferreira, E. A., Siqueira, H. E., Boas, E. V. V., Hermes, V. S., & Rios, A. de O. (2016). Compostos bioativos e atividade antioxidante de frutos de cultivares de abacaxizeiros. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 38(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452016146

Gao, X., Cox, K. L., & He, P. (2014). Functions of calcium-dependent protein kinases in plant innate immunity. Plants, 3(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants3010160

Garcia-Seco, D., Zhang, Y., Gutierrez-Mañero, F. J., Martin, C., & Ramos-Solano, B. (2015). Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens to blackberry under field conditions improves fruit quality by modifying flavonoid metabolism. PLoS ONE, 10(11), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142639

Hamarawati, E., Mugiastuti, E., Manan, A., Loekito, S., & Soesanto, L. (2017). Applications of Pseudomnas fluorescens P60 in Controlling Basal Stem Rot (Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.) on Dragon Fruit Seedlings. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajppaj.2018.1.6

Hocking, B., Tyerman, S. D., Burton, R. A., & Gilliham, M. (2016). Fruit calcium: Transport and physiology. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00569

Hu, H., Li, X., Dong, C., & Chen, W. (2012). Effects of wax treatment on the physiology and cellular structure of harvested pineapple during cold storage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(26), 6613–6619. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf204962z

Jiang, M. Y., Wang, Z. R., Chen, K. W., Kan, J. Q., Wang, K. T., Zalán, Z. S., Hegyi, F., Takács, K., & Du, M. Y. (2019). Inhibition of postharvest gray mould decay and induction of disease resistance by Pseudomonas fluorescens in grapes. Acta Alimentaria, 48(3), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1556/066.2019.48.3.2

Kleemann, L. (2016). Organic Pineapple Farming in Ghana - A Good Choice for Smallholders? The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(3), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0096

Lu, X. H., Sun, D. Q., Wu, Q. S., Liu, S. H., & Sun, G. M. (2014). Physico-chemical properties, antioxidant activity and mineral contents of pineapple genotypes grown in China. Molecules, 19(6), 8518–8532. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19068518

Madani, B., Mirshekari, A., Sofo, A., & Tengku Muda Mohamed, M. (2016). Preharvest calcium applications improve postharvest quality of papaya fruits (Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika II). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 39(10), 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1143500

Martínez, J. I., Gómez-Garrido, M., Gómez-López, M. D., Faz, Á., Martínez-Martínez, S., & Acosta, J. A. (2019). Pseudomonas fluorescens affects nutrient dynamics in plant-soil system for melon production. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 79(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392019000200223

Meeteren, U. V., & Aliniaeifard, S. (2016). Stomata and postharvest physiology. In S. Pareek (Ed.), Postharvest ripening physiology of crops (pp. 157–216). Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.

Morkunas, I., & Ratajczak, L. (2014). The role of sugar signaling in plant defense responses against fungal pathogens. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36(7), 1607–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1559-z

Nadzirah, K. Z., Zainal, S., Noriham, A., Siti Roha, A. M., & Nadya, H. (2013). Physico- chemical properties of pineapple variety N36 harvested and stored at different maturity stages. International Food Research Journal, 20(1), 225–231.

Naseem, M., Kunz, M., & Dandekar, T. (2017). Plant–Pathogen Maneuvering over Apoplastic Sugars. Trends in Plant Science, 22(9), 740–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.07.001

Noichinda, S., Bodhipadma, K., & Wongs-Aree, C. (2017). Antioxidant Potential and Their changes during postharvest handling of tropical fruits. In S. Pareek (Ed.), Novel Postharvest Treatments of Fresh produce (pp. 633–662). Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370149-20

Paull, R. ., & Chen, C. C. (2003). Postharvest Physiology, Handling and Storage of Pineapple. In D. P. Bartholomew, R. E. Paull, & K. G. Rohrbach (Eds.), The pineapple: botany, production and uses (pp. 253–279). London, UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995038.0253

Paull, R. E., & Chen, C. C. (2018). Postharvest Physiology, Handling and Storage of Pineapple. In G. M. Sanewski, D. P. Bartholomew, & R. E. Paull (Eds.), The pineapple: botany, production and uses (pp. 295–323). London, UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786393302.0295

Peckham, G. D., Kaneshiro, W. S., Luu, V., Berestecky, J. M., & Alvarez, A. M. (2010). Specificity of monoclonal antibodies to strains of Dickeya sp. that cause bacterial heart rot of pineapple. Hybridoma, 29(5), 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1089/hyb.2010.0034

Pérez-Rodriguez, M. M., Pontin, M., Lipinski, V., Bottini, R., Piccoli, P., & Cohen, A. C. (2020). Pseudomonas fluorescens and Azospirillum brasilense Increase yield and fruit quality of tomato under field conditions. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 20(4), 1614–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00233-x

Pires de Matos, A. (2019). Main pests affecting pineapple plantations and their impact on crop development. Acta Horticulturae, 1239, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1239.17

Rohrbach, K. G., & Johnson, M. W. (2003). Pests, diseases and weeds. In D. P. Bartholomew, R. E. Paull, & K. G. Rohrbach (Eds.), The pineapple: botany, production and uses (pp. 203–251). London, UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995038.0203

Saradhuldhat, P., & Paull, R. E. (2007). Pineapple organic acid metabolism and accumulation during fruit development. Scientia Horticulturae, 112(3), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.031

Shamsudin, R., Zulkifli, N. A., & Kamarul Zaman, A. A. (2020). Quality attributes of fresh pineapple-mango juice blend during storage. International Food Research Journal, 27(1), 141–149.

Sipes, B., & Pires de Matos, A. (2018). Pests, diseases and weeds. In G. M. Sanewski, D. P. Bartholomew, & R. E. Paull (Eds.), The pineapple: botany, production and uses (pp. 269–294). London, UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786393302.0269

Siti Roha, A. M., Zainal, S., Noriham, A., & Nadzirah, K. Z. (2013). Determination of sugar content in pineapple waste variety N36. International Food Research Journal, 20(4), 1941–1943.

Soesanto, L., Mugiastuti, E., & Rahayuniati, R. F. (2011). Biochemical characteristic of Pseudomonas fluorescens P60. Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, 2, 19–26.

Soesanto, Loekas, Mugiastuti, E., & Khoeruriza. (2019). Granular formulation test of Pseudomonas fluorescens P60 for controling bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) of tomato in planta. Agrivita, 41(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v41i3.2318

Soesanto, Loekas, Mugiastuti, E., Rahayuniati, R. F., Manan, A., Dewi, R. S., Java, C., & Java, C. (2018). Compatibility test of four Trichoderma spp. isolates on several synthetic pesticides. AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science, 40(3), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v40i3.1126

Soesanto, Loekas, Solikhah, A. N., Mugiastuti, E., & Suharti, W. S. (2020). Application of Trichoderma harzianum T10 liquid formula based on soybean flour against cucumber seedlings damping-off (Pythium sp.). Akta Agrosia, 23(1), 11–18.

Sood, M., Kapoor, D., Kumar, V., & Sheteiwy, M. S. (2020). Trichoderma :The “Secrets” of a Multitalented. Plants, 9, 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060762

Soteriou, G. A., Kyriacou, M. C., Siomos, A. S., & Gerasopoulos, D. (2014). Evolution of watermelon fruit physicochemical and phytochemical composition during ripening as affected by grafting. Food Chemistry, 165, 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.120

Sueno, W. S. K., Marrero, G., de Silva, A. S., Sether, D. M., & Alvarez, A. M. (2014). Diversity of dickeya strains collected from pineapple plants and irrigation water in Hawaii. Plant Disease, 98(6), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-13-0219-RE

Wang, Y., Fu, X. Z., Liu, J. H., & Hong, N. (2011). Differential structure and physiological response to canker challenge between ‘Meiwa’ kumquat and ‘Newhall’ navel orange with contrasting resistance. Scientia Horticulturae, 128(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.01.010

Yamada, K., Saijo, Y., Nakagami, H., & Takano, Y. (2016). Regulation of sugar transporter activity for antibacterial defense in Arabidopsis. Science, 354(6318), 1427–1430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5692




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14720/aas.2022.118.3.2485

Povratne povezave

  • Trenutno ni nobenih povratnih povezav.


Avtorske pravice (c) 2022 Diego Mauricio CANO-REINOSO, Loekas SOESANTO , KHARISUN, Condro WIBOWO

 

Acta agriculturae Slovenica je odprtodostopna revija, ki objavlja pod pogoji licence Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva (CC BY).

                     


eISSN 1854-1941